<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>prompt-injection on Yusuf Yildirim</title><link>https://yusufyildirim.com/tags/prompt-injection/</link><description>Recent content in prompt-injection on Yusuf Yildirim</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>2026 Yusuf Yildirim</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://yusufyildirim.com/tags/prompt-injection/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Hidden Text in Resumes: Measuring Prompt Injection in the Wild</title><link>https://yusufyildirim.com/posts/resume-prompt-injection/</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://yusufyildirim.com/posts/resume-prompt-injection/</guid><description>My notes on a USENIX Security 2026 paper that checked about 200,000 real resumes for hidden prompt injections, and found that most of them don&amp;#39;t look like the attacks researchers usually study.</description></item></channel></rss>